Free Consultation 215.567.2010


Caesar Rivise Works With European Patent Counsel to Achieve Positive Outcomes in European Patent Oppositions

Posted on Nov 30, 2015 in Blog

Caesar Rivise attorney David Gornish recently attended two different patent opposition hearings before the European Patent Office (EPO) in Munich and The Hague, respectively. David worked closely with European patent attorneys to achieve positive outcomes in both cases for the patent owner, a worldwide developer and manufacturer of pharmaceutical packaging products.

Read More

Supreme Court’s Decision in Nautilus Costs Dow Chemical Co. $30 Million in Unrelated Litigation

Posted on Sep 4, 2015 in Blog

Dow Chemical Company (“Dow”) sued NOVA Chemicals Inc. (“NOVA”) for infringement of the claims of two U.S. Patents (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,847,053 and 6,111,023). The Delaware District Court found the claims to be infringed and not invalid. This decision was affirmed on appeal to the Federal Circuit, which held, inter alia, that the asserted claims were not indefinite.

Read More

U.S. Supreme Court Affirms Rule Precluding Post-Expiration Patent Royalty Payments

Posted on Jun 29, 2015 in Blog

In 1991, Kimble patented a toy glove that enabled a user to shoot a pressurized string from it. Kimble attempted to sell or license the patent to Marvel Entertainment for Marvel’s Spider-Man character. Marvel declined. However, Marvel started to sell a toy which Kimble alleged infringed the patent, so Kimble brought suit for infringement of its patent.

Read More

No Need To Take Revenge Porn Lying Down

Posted on Jun 23, 2015 in Blog

The age of the internet and digital media has created new problems in protecting personal privacy. The viral nature of online intimate and explicit images allows for any individual image to quickly spread across the internet. Once an image has spread across the internet, there are a limited number of ways to stop its further distribution.

Read More

Claims to Detection and Analysis of Fetal DNA in Maternal Plasma Were Found Invalid for Failing to Transform the Subject Matter of the Claims From a Natural Phenomenon Into Patent-Eligible Subject Matter

Posted on Jun 22, 2015 in Blog

In Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v Sequenom, Inc. (No. 14-1139 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 12, 2015)) the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“CAFC”) upheld a decision by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California invalidating a patent covering a ground breaking technique for fetal testing and diagnostics.

Read More

U.S. Supreme Court Rules Good-Faith Belief in Patent Invalidity is Not a Defense to Induced Infringement

Posted on May 27, 2015 in Blog

On May 26, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States, in Commil USA, LLC v CISCO Systems, Inc. in a 6-2 split decision, held that an alleged infringer’s good-faith belief that the patent-in-suit is invalid is not a defense to a claim of induced patent infringement. Justice Kennedy wrote the majority opinion. Justice Scalia and Chief Justice Roberts dissented. Justice Breyer did not take part in the decision.

Read More

Google Wants to Purchase Your Patents

Posted on May 5, 2015 in Blog

If you own a U.S. patent and would consider selling it, Google has instituted an experimental “Patent Purchase Promotion” from May 8 – May 22, 2015. During this “open period”, patentees can submit a Patent Order Submission Form for each patent (one per patent), which allows the patentee to describe his/her patent , along with the offer price to sell it to Google.

Read More

HBO’s John Oliver on Abuse of the U.S. Patent System and How You Can Use the Patent Application Alert Service to Do Something About It

Posted on Apr 24, 2015 in Blog

The April 19, 2015 episode of HBO’s Last Week Tonight featured a critique of the U.S. patent system by host John Oliver. After emphasizing the importance of patents to the funding of companies as evidenced by everyone’s favorite investors, the “sharks” of ABC’s Shark Tank, Oliver proceeded to provide an entertaining, albeit simplistic, overview of the economic harm caused by overly broad and vague patents asserted by non-practicing entities, which are more commonly known as “patent trolls”.

Read More

Supreme Court Finds Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Decision Can Have Preclusive Effect in Litigation

Posted on Mar 25, 2015 in Blog

The Supreme Court on March 24, 2015 decided that rulings of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office as to likelihood of confusion are binding on District Courts.

Read More

Hague Agreement Adoption by U.S. Will Reduce Barriers to Global Protection of Designs

Posted on Feb 23, 2015 in Blog

U.S. applicants interested in protecting their designs outside the U.S. will soon have the option of filing a single international design patent application under the Hague Agreement. The Hague Agreement goes into effect in the U.S. on May 13, 2015.

Read More


1635 Market Street, 12th Floor
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2212

215-567-2010 | 215-751-1142

View Map


King Street Plaza - Suite 304. 800 N. King Street
Wilmington, Delaware 19801

302-544-9100 | 302-544-9103

View Map

Lehigh Valley

2030 Tilghman Street, Suite 201A
Allentown, Pennsylvania 18104-4399

610-255-7551 | 610-255-7542

View Map