News & Resources
特許が「質」と定義される意味とは?
Posted on Jan 28, 2015 in Articles
クライアントに業務を取り扱う弁護士に何を期待するか尋ねてみてください。その答えは、業務に「質」が伴うことでしょう。誰でも、法律サービスを購入すると、代わりに質を手に入れると考えます。しかし、特許の分野において、特許が質を持つ意味とは何ですか?
Read MoreWhat Does It Mean for a Patent to Be Defined as ‘Quality’?
Posted on Jan 28, 2015 in Articles
Ask any client what he or she expects from the lawyers who are handling his or her work, and invariably the answer you receive is that the work must possess “quality.” Everyone wants to know that when they purchase legal services, they will get quality in return. But in the patent realm, what does it mean for a patent to have quality?
Read MoreUse of Data Analysis Tools by Caesar Rivise Attorneys Featured in National Legal Periodical Article
Posted on Jan 27, 2015 in News
Caesar Rivise Managing Partner, David Tener, is featured in an article relating to the firm’s use of Patent Advisor, a data analysis tool for patent prosecution in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Attorneys at the firm use Patent Advisor to analyze the performance statistics of examiners when formulating a prosecution strategy for firm clients.
Read MoreU.S. Buyers and Their Legal Advisors Beware: Indian Court’s Injunction Against Glenmark’s Continued Infringement of Symed Lab’s Process Patent Suggests That Pharmaceutical Method Claims Are Becoming More Readily Enforceable in India
Posted on Jan 23, 2015 in Blog
An ad interim injunction passed by the Honorable Delhi High Court (on January 19, 2015) against Glenmark restrained infringement of Symed’s Process Patent Nos. IN 213062 and IN 213063.
Read MoreSupreme Court in Teva v. Sandoz Holds That Claim Construction Facts Must Be Reviewed Under Clear Error Standard On Appeal
Posted on Jan 20, 2015 in Blog
On Tuesday, January 20, 2015, in Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. et al. v. Sandoz Inc. et al., case number 13-854, the United States Supreme Court, in a 7-2 decision by Justice Breyer abolished the CAFC’s en banc practice that claim construction rulings of the district court be reviewed de novo. Instead, the Court ruled that these ruling must be entitled to deference of the district court’s factual findings as Teva had requested in a dispute regarding its highly profitable Copaxone product for multiple sclerosis.
Read MoreFurther USPTO Guidance re Patent Subject Matter Eligibility
Posted on Dec 18, 2014 in Blog
In light of the relatively recent Supreme Court decisions in the area of patent subject matter eligibility, the United States Patent and Trademark Office has been attempting to provide guidance to its Patent Examiners to use in determining whether claims are directed to patent eligible subject matter. Further to that end, the Patent Office has released new Interim Guidance on Patent Subject Matter Eligibility, which was published in the Federal Register on December 16, 2014.
Read MoreRuling In Your Case May Depend On Whether 112(6) Applies
Posted on Dec 5, 2014 in Articles
Whether prosecuting a U.S. patent application, or litigating a U.S. patent, patent practitioners must consider the implications of 35 U.S.C. §112(6).[1] These implications are significant, because whether or not 112(6) applies to a claim can determine claim construction or can render a claim indefinite and thus invalid.
Read MoreLawrence E. Ashery Joins Caesar Rivise Law Firm as a Partner
Posted on Nov 5, 2014 in News
The intellectual property law firm Caesar Rivise, PC is pleased to announce that Lawrence E. Ashery has joined the firm as a partner. Mr. Ashery joined the firm from the RatnerPrestia firm, where he had been a shareholder.
Read MoreCaesar Rivise Client Dr. Sunil Singhal in the News
Posted on Nov 4, 2014 in News
Caesar Rivise client, surgeon Dr. Sunil Singhal, was recently featured on the program The Doctors and on CBS News for his advances in a method of visual identification of cancerous tissue during an operation to remove cancerous tumors.
Read MoreCaesar Rivise Earns Top Tier Ranking in U.S. News & World Report Rankings
Posted on Nov 4, 2014 in News
On November 3, 2014, U.S. News & World Report released its 2015 “Best Law Firms” list, which identifies law firms “recognized for professional excellence with persistently impressive ratings from clients and peers.”
Read More